© Yu Chun Christopher Wong/Shutterstock.com

Aurora is a relational database specifically designed for the cloud. It combines the simplicity and low cost of open-source databases with the performance and availability of typical enterprise databases. It is fully managed and compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. 

We will discuss Aurora and RDS to understand their differences. We will list the features, pros, cons, and differences to help you make a better choice. 

Aurora vs. RDS: A Side-by-Side Comparison 

4 Must-Know Facts About Aurora vs. RDS

  • In an Aurora database, data is separated into 10GB blocks and spread over many disks, with a storage capacity of 10GB to 64TB.RDS performs automatic database instance backups, daily data snapshots, transaction log preservation, and point-in-time recovery.Aurora provides simple scalability — storage is expanded automatically as the database expands, and you can set up to 15 Read Replicas to serve more read requests. RDS automatically updates database engine software. It allows database replication with automated failover across several availability zones to increase the dependability and availability of workloads.

Aurora: Complete History

For significantly revamping rational database storage for cloud contexts, Aurora developers won the SGMID System Award in 2019.

Features of Aurora

Let’s discuss some features of Aurora for more understanding. 

Performance and Scalability

One of the best features of Aurora is scalability. It automatically increases the database volume size per storage need. The volume increases to 10GB and can reach a maximum of 128TB. This conveniently meets the required storage needs for many businesses. 

High Security

Easy to Use

Cost-Effective

You are charged for the processing power and storage you have used. There are no other extra upfront charges. Once you pay your monthly payments, you are good to go.

Migration Support

You can move your local database to Aurora using the pg-dump and MySQL dump commands.

Availability and Durability

This storage is fault-tolerant and self-healing, designed for the cloud. It offers the availability of 99.99% with six copies of data replicated across three different availability zones. This improves safety and minimizes the chance of storage failure.

Pros of Aurora

  • Failover time is faster15 read replicasRegular backups Good speed Open-source compatibility (MySQL and PostgreSQL)

Cons of Aurora

  • Supports MySQL-5.6.10; thus, you can’t use it if you want additional features or if you have an outdated version of MySQLCurrently, you cannot use MyISAM tables. Aurora only supports InnoDB.You can only use r3large, so if you have a small RDS, it is impossible to use.

RDS is designed to make it easier to set up, run, and scale a relational database for use in applications. Because of its design, it is a simpler system for users. Let us look at some of its features. 

Features of RDS

  • It replaces the host automatically if the hardware fails or stops working.

  • You don’t need any upfront payment. They charge the resources you have used. Further, they offer pricing models like “On Demand” or “Reserved Instances”.

  • Security is taken care of, especially when accessing their database and services.

  • RDS controls the time of automatic backups and stores up to five times worth of translation log backups.

  • Has an automated backupHardware maintenanceAutomatic failover and simplified disaster recoveryAutomated storage allocation.

  • No guarantee of CPU and storage performanceDoesn’t offer a guarantee on data lossDoesn’t have automated compression managementNo automated performance tuningDoesn’t have root access to the serverOnly has five read replicas

Aurora vs. RDS: Which One Should You Use? Which Is Better?

So, which is the best choice? Aurora would be ideal, because it has excellent security, scalability, performance, availability, operational cost, and management capabilities. However, let us look at their differences to back our argument. 

When you look at the performance, you will notice Aurora offers fives times the standard throughput performance on a regular MySQL, or two times on PostgreSQL. Additionally, it doesn’t store log buffers — it writes them to the storage.

RDS leverages SSD storage for I/Q throughput performance. It also has SSD-backed storage options from which you can choose, one for high-performance OLTO and the other one for cost-effective use. 

So, if we compare Aurora and RDS speed, Aurora is consistent and reliable.

With RDS, there is a chance of data loss in case of a failover because they read replicas manually. With Aurora, they read the replica automatically and quickly if failover happens. That means data loss is impossible. 

Furthermore, Aurora increases its database, which does not affect its performance. With RDS, you set your storage limits. The rest is done by auto scaling. 

You will notice significant differences in the features, pros, and cons. The above are some essential differences that make us believe Aurora is your best choice. 

Final Thoughts

Aurora’s unique features give you better scalability and performance than RDS. Though their prices are a bit higher, they are ideal for read-intensive workloads for businesses. Learn more about AWS services and do a comparison on various aspects to make an informed decision.

Up Next…